The Next Vice President of the United States

McCain and Palin!

Jermiah Wright--Best line from this video: “If you don’t want to get treated different, then don’t ask to get treated special.”

Black & White on the Grey Matters (Jermiah Wright)

Here's a black Man I would vote for

Black & White on the Grey Matters 2 (War)

To my Catholic Friends (And Wife):

Conservative Catholic legal scholar Douglas Kmiec has endorsed Barak Obama for president in this year's election and offers a strange rationalization for voting in support of a pro-abortion candidate. I'll try to present the reasons why Kmiec's rationalization is wrong and why Catholic Doctrine should either be left out of a person's decision on who to vote or that it doesn't necessariloy point to a vote for a Democrat. Kmiec offers a formulation used often by Catholics when voting for such liberal candidates:

Douglas W. Kmiec, a conservative Catholic legal scholar at Pepperdine School of Law, said that although the formal teachings of the American Catholic bishops put primacy on the sanctity of life, including fetuses and embryos, doctrine allows for voting on other grounds, including the Iraq war, which the Vatican has opposed from the start.

Mr. Kmiec, a Republican who served in the Justice Department under President Ronald Reagan, said he was supporting Mr. Obama because his platform met the standard of justice and concern for the poor the church has always defended. This year, Mr. Kmiec was denied communion by a priest at a gathering of Catholic business people because of his support for Mr. Obama. Mr. Kmiec said, “The proper question for Catholics to ask is not ‘Can I vote for him?’ but ‘Why shouldn’t I vote for the candidate who feels more passionately and speaks more credibly about economic fairness for the average family, who will be a true steward of the environment, and who will treat the immigrant family with respect?’”

Issues of economic fairness do appear in the Catholic catechism, although only in general terms. The teachings do not prescribe a certainty of policy as Catholic or un-Catholic. Paragraphs 1938, 1941, and 1947 emphasize the need for action by Catholics to reduce sinful inequalities between the rich and the poor, but generally casts this in rather stark terms, with to the quality of life of little resemblance those deemed poor in the US:

• 43% of the poor own their homes, and the average home is a three-bedroom house with a garage and 1.5 bathrooms
• Over two-thirds of households have two rooms per occupant, which belies the notion of overcrowding
• 80% of the poor have air conditioning
• Almost 75% own one car; 31% own two or more
• The average living space for the American poor is larger than the average space for all people in Paris, Vienna, and London, among other cities in Europe

Furthermore, the catechism talks mostly about personal work to resolve sinful inequalities, not the establishment of a government mandate that operates under a redistributionist policy. It doesn’t forbid it, either, and that’s really the point. Both parties want to help Americans live well, but have different philosophies on how to get there. Voters in general should support the candidate who best represents their own approach to these issues, but that has nothing to do with Catholicism.

Neither does the Iraq war. While the Vatican disagreed with it, war itself does not violate Catholic doctrine (para 2309). The catechism does explicitly call “indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas” a violation of doctrine, but the US has not engaged in that kind of warfare in decades, and not ever without substantial provocation (para 2314). Nor is it even applicable in this context, since the war in Iraq is over, and both candidates support an expansion of the war in Afghanistan. Once again, voters have to rely on something other than Catholic teachings to cast their vote.

However, the doctrine on abortion for Catholics leaves no room for any subjective application of other values. Paragraph 2271 plainly casts “every procured abortion” as a “moral evil”, and reinforces that by stating plainly that this teaching is irrevocable. Paragraph 2272 calls “formal cooperation” in abortion a “grave offense”, meaning a mortal sin. Why? Here, science and faith intersect. Scientifically, an embryo has life at the moment when the cells divide, if not a few minutes earlier at conception. Further, the embryo is innately human, with unique DNA specific to humans — and is therefore human life, regardless of its level of convenience to the mother. Catholicism teaches that human life, especially innocent human life, is sacred and “must be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being.”

Anyone who formally cooperates in abortion, therefore, sins, and cannot honestly receive the Eucharist until they repent. That conclusion is inescapable from the catechism in paragraphs 2271, 2272, and 2274, and explicit in 2322:

From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a “criminal” practice (GS 27 § 3), gravely contrary to the moral law. The Church imposes the canonical penalty of excommunication for this crime against human life.

Regardless of how Catholics feel about economic “fairness” or the Iraq war, that trumps all else for observant Catholics. Formal cooperation with abortion means excommunication, which indicates just how foundational this issue is for the Church and its members.

Many Catholics maneuver around this by simply ignoring it, and they’re free to do so. Membership in the Church is voluntary, after all, and people can leave the Catholic Church if they disagree with its catechism (and strictly speaking, they should do so under those circumstances). However, it’s either a gross misrepresentation or self-delusion to argue that abortion is simply one issue among many for observant Catholics and that economic policy or foreign affairs can outweigh it.

While Catholic teaching creates separation to better to secure religious liberty (Matthew 22:21: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's."), it also contemplates that practice will integrate religion with everyday life including civic duties such a voting. As such Catholic Doctrine enjoins upon life and government not separateness but interdependence, not autonomy but reciprocity. As pronounced in Ad Diognetum 5: 5, 10:

Pay to all of them their dues, taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue is due, respect to whom respect is due, honor to whom honor is due. [Christians] reside in their own nations, but as resident aliens. They participate in all things as citizens and endure all things as foreigners.... They obey the established laws and their way of life surpasses the laws.... So noble is the position to which God has assigned them that they are not allowed to desert it.

Obama Backpedaling after he played the Race Card

Well, Obama got caught using the race card and, unlike DC's Marion Barry, people actually called his highness's but on it. Now the presumptuous one is backpedaling as quick as he can. Instead of calling McCain and Republicans (i.e., white people) racist Obama is using the cynical line.

What is cynical of asking about the accomplishments of Obama? Law professor (adjunct), state senator (7 years), and U.S. senator (3 and 1/2 years) seem to be the standard line of defense. Clearly, if elected, Obama will be the least experienced president since William Henry Harrison won in 1840. This does not mean Obama will not be a good president but it should not prevent people from further questioning him. The scary part of this election is that Obama's popularity is clearing out of wack with what he has accomplished. More to the point his celebrity is greater than his deeds. Obama is a classic demagogue and people should be nervous when only a minority of voters question his worth.

The recent race card controversy gives me hope that Obama and his supporters cannot prevent a real debate from occurring. However, they will try again to paint McCain and Republicans as racist. It is what Democrats do best. Try to win by preventing their opponents from competing against them.

Advice from a one-time bacholar

Hopefully this will be an ongoing series as I remember more from those bygone days. Anyhow, here are my first two tips for single men:

1) Once you spend money willy nilly to nail a chick, you know its over.

2) If you want to get some liquor into a game one great method is to carry a pint of whiskey so that security will find it first. When you are told that you can't bring it in chugged it all right in front of security and continue walking through. What the security doesn't know is that the pint of whiskey is iced tea and the “real alcohol” in still in your pockets.

How not to write a thank you note

From: Sincere Gentleman

To: Prospective Employers

Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:43 PM

Subject: Thank You



Hey, guys,



In the spirit of yesterday’s gang-bang-style interview, I’ve opted for a group thank you email. I hate crafting these follow-ups and I’m not too hot at sincere thank you notes either, but writing one email is easier than writing four. I call it the less = more theory. Raymond Carver called it minimalism. My ex-girlfriend used to call it, “I’m just not that hungry.” Really though, skimping on thank you emails gives me more time to reply to this chick I met on Mypsace who is new to the area and posts pictures on her personal webpage.


Cheers,

________

Od'e to the Local Bar

Like a king in his castle, a gentleman’s courtly home is his local bar. He is just as regal while sitting on his bar stool, making loud, slurred chitchat with regular patrons, as he is when he feels the urge to actually make a stool and momentarily retire to the establishment’s porcelain throne. Sitting there, with his trouser around his ankles and his drink in hand as if it were a scepter, the gentleman is in his most satisfying and distinguished element.

Larry King: The Mug Shot